Iran University of Medical Sciences • Journals

Policies & standards

Central access to the editorial, peer review, authorship, ethics, consent, rights and open science policies that govern all journals in the IUMS portfolio.

Applies to IUMS journals portfolio Journal-specific policies may add further details.
Version Policy suite v1.0 Last updated March 2025.
Core standard Transparency Clear expectations for authors, reviewers and editors.
Main areas Review, ethics, rights Organised by policy domain for fast navigation.

Editorial governance & independence

Explains how Editors-in-Chief, associate editors and the publisher share responsibilities, how editorial independence is protected, and how conflicts of interest in editorial decision-making are managed.

Editorial governance
Editors & publisher
Defines the remit of Editors-in-Chief and boards, their relationship with the University and the publisher, and how strategic oversight is exercised without interfering with individual decisions.
  • Role descriptions for editors and boards
  • Editorship changes and handover
  • Handling editor conflicts of interest
  • Relationship with sponsoring societies or centres
Editorial independence
Integrity
Clarifies that decisions are based on scientific merit, ethical soundness and relevance, not on commercial, political or institutional pressure.
  • No direct influence of advertisers or sponsors
  • Firewalls between editorial and commercial decisions
  • How concerns about interference can be raised

Peer review & decision appeals

Describes the default double-anonymous review model, reviewer selection, report use, decisions, and author appeals or queries.

Peer review model
Double-anonymous
By default, IUMS journals use double-anonymous peer review unless a journal clearly states an alternative model.
  • Initial editorial screening
  • Criteria for inviting and excluding reviewers
  • Number of reviews and decision categories
  • Use of statistical or methodological reviewers
Appeals & queries
After decision
Sets out how authors can raise well-reasoned appeals or ask for clarification when they believe a decision is not consistent with journal policy or evidence.
  • What counts as a valid appeal
  • Who reviews appeals and timelines
  • Possible outcomes of an appeal

Guidance for reviewers

Outlines expectations for confidentiality, objectivity, conflicts of interest, responsible AI use, and clear constructive reports.

Reviewer responsibilities
Reviewers
Reviewers provide balanced, evidence-based comments focused on rigour, ethics and clarity, while treating all materials as confidential.
  • Before accepting an invitation
  • Structuring comments to authors and editors
  • Flagging suspected ethical issues
  • Recognition and reviewer certificates

Authorship & contributorship

Defines who qualifies as an author, how contributions are documented, authorship changes, and group or corporate authorship.

Authorship criteria
ICMJE-inspired
Uses authorship criteria inspired by ICMJE: substantial contribution, drafting or critical revision, final approval, and shared accountability.
  • CRediT contributorship statements
  • Author additions or removals
  • Disputes and institutional involvement
Corresponding authors
Accountability
The corresponding author ensures co-authors meet criteria, approve the manuscript, and are aware of submissions, revisions and communications.
  • Maintaining accurate affiliations
  • Managing responses to reviewers
  • Ensuring conflict transparency

Generative AI & digital tools

Sets guardrails for responsible AI use by authors, reviewers and editors, including disclosure and confidentiality requirements.

AI & authorship
Not an author
AI systems cannot meet authorship criteria, cannot take responsibility for content, and must not be listed as authors or co-authors.
  • Permitted uses such as language editing
  • Required disclosures about AI support
  • Restrictions on uploading confidential material
AI in peer review
Confidentiality
Reviewers and editors must not upload manuscripts or non-public data to public AI tools; human accountability must remain central.
  • Permitted AI-assisted reading or notes
  • Disclosure to editors where tools are used

General author guidance

Summarises cross-portfolio requirements for manuscript structure, reporting guidelines, data availability, and submission checklists.

Portfolio-wide guidance
Across journals
Provides shared expectations for article types, reporting standards, data statements and ethical disclosures applicable to all IUMS journals.
  • Reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE and CARE
  • Data availability expectations
  • Submission checklists and file requirements

Research ethics & integrity

Sets expectations for ethical conduct in studies involving humans, animals or sensitive data, and how potential integrity breaches are assessed.

Human & animal ethics
Approvals & oversight
Requires appropriate ethics committee approval or waiver, transparent reporting of approval details, and adherence to national and international frameworks.
  • Clinical trial registration requirements
  • Ethics for observational and qualitative studies
  • Animal welfare standards and reporting

Clinical trials: registration & reporting

Provides expectations for prospective registration, ethical conduct and transparent reporting of clinical trials.

Trial registration & transparency
Human intervention studies
Requires prospective registration of interventional trials in recognised registries and clear reporting of identifiers in submissions.
  • Acceptable registries such as IRCT and ClinicalTrials.gov
  • Registration before first participant enrolment
  • Reporting trial IDs in abstract and methods
  • Updating registry records and protocol changes

Image integrity & figure preparation

Explains how images and scientific figures must be captured, processed and presented accurately.

Image manipulation & originals
Data fidelity
Prohibits inappropriate manipulation and requires authors to retain original, unprocessed image files that can be provided on request.
  • Acceptable global adjustments
  • Avoiding splicing or selective enhancement
  • Scale bars and multi-panel figures
  • Image-screening during editorial assessment

Misconduct, complaints & investigations

Covers responses to fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, duplicate publication, peer-review manipulation and other concerns.

Handling concerns
COPE-aligned
Explains how concerns can be raised, what information should be provided, triage, and when institutions or funders may be contacted.
  • Flowchart-based decision-making
  • Interim expressions of concern
  • Record-keeping and transparency

Corrections, retractions & withdrawals

Sets out how the scholarly record is maintained through corrections, expressions of concern, retractions and withdrawals.

Maintaining the record
Post-publication
Distinguishes minor corrections, major corrections, expressions of concern and retractions, and explains linking notices to original articles.
  • When errata are sufficient
  • Retraction vs. expression of concern
  • Third-party correction requests

Inclusive author name changes

Explains how authors can request updates to published name, affiliation or pronouns while protecting privacy and record integrity.

Author identity updates
Equity & inclusion
Describes the process for name changes, documentation where needed, and minimising unnecessary disclosure to reviewers and readers.
  • Request channels and verification
  • Silent corrections where appropriate
  • Coordination with indexers and ORCID

Accessibility & inclusive publishing

Describes the commitment to accessible content and platforms for authors, reviewers and readers using assistive technologies.

Accessible content & platforms
Readers & authors
Outlines expectations for accessible documents, alternative text, readable layouts and inclusive language across the portfolio.
  • Figures, tables and supplementary files
  • Screen readers and high-contrast viewing
  • Inclusive and non-discriminatory language

Research data & code sharing

Describes how authors should manage, preserve and share underlying research data and analytical code where appropriate.

Data & code availability
Open science
Sets expectations for data availability statements, trusted repositories, and protection of participants privacy when sharing sensitive data or code.
  • Open sharing vs. controlled access
  • Recommended repository types
  • Documentation and citation of datasets and code

Preprints, postprints & article sharing

Sets out how authors may share manuscript versions before and after peer review, and how preprints interact with journal submission.

Version sharing
Preprints & repositories
Clarifies which manuscript versions can be posted, how to cite preprints, and what happens after acceptance and formal publication.
  • Preprint posting at or before submission
  • Updating preprint records after acceptance
  • Sharing accepted manuscripts and versions of record

APCs, waivers & funding

Summarises how article processing charges, waivers and discounts are handled independently of editorial decisions.

Charges & waivers
Transparency
Indicates where APC information is displayed, how waiver requests are handled, and confirms that decisions are not influenced by payment status.
  • Eligibility for waivers or discounts
  • When APCs are discussed

Interlibrary loan & text/data mining

Clarifies use of IUMS journal content for interlibrary loan and text/data mining within copyright and licence limits.

Library use & mining
Libraries & institutions
Summarises permitted ILL practices, TDM conditions for open access and licensed content, and how to request additional permissions.
  • Open access content under Creative Commons licences
  • TDM conditions for subscription content
  • Attribution and responsible reuse

Archiving & indexer readiness

Outlines long-term preservation of the scholarly record and work with indexing services such as Scopus, Web of Science and MEDLINE.

Preservation & archiving
Long term
Describes how articles are preserved through publisher systems and archiving services, including platform changes or journal closure.
  • Institutional and national repositories
  • Continuity of DOIs and links
Indexers & discoverability
Scopus / WoS / MEDLINE
Summarises how journals are supported in meeting indexer criteria and maintaining accurate metadata and stable identifiers.
  • Minimum metadata requirements
  • DOI, ORCID and funder identifiers
  • Indexer corrections and updates